<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 451 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446767</link>
    <description>A statement under section 108 of the Customs Act can support conviction only when its voluntariness and truth are proved by reliable evidence; here, inconsistencies, lack of independent corroboration, and suspicious surrounding circumstances meant the prosecution did not discharge that burden, so the statement was not relied on. The alleged retraction in Ext. D1 was also not proved, because mere production of the document did not establish its contents. The section 313 CrPC statement contained no clear admission and could not, by itself, sustain the case. As the trial court&#039;s view was not perverse and the evidence showed material contradictions, the acquittal was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:59:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 451 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446767</link>
      <description>A statement under section 108 of the Customs Act can support conviction only when its voluntariness and truth are proved by reliable evidence; here, inconsistencies, lack of independent corroboration, and suspicious surrounding circumstances meant the prosecution did not discharge that burden, so the statement was not relied on. The alleged retraction in Ext. D1 was also not proved, because mere production of the document did not establish its contents. The section 313 CrPC statement contained no clear admission and could not, by itself, sustain the case. As the trial court&#039;s view was not perverse and the evidence showed material contradictions, the acquittal was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>