<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34852</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted leave in a case concerning delay condonation and the formulation of crucial questions under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court directed the High Court to address specific questions regarding the treatment of unutilized MODVAT credit and customs duty in the pending Income Tax Appeal. Additionally, the Court affirmed the admissibility of a claim for depreciation due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations but did not address the taxability of interest and miscellaneous income under Section 56 due to the Department&#039;s failure to present submissions. The civil appeal was allowed with no costs, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and comprehensive argument presentation in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34852</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted leave in a case concerning delay condonation and the formulation of crucial questions under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court directed the High Court to address specific questions regarding the treatment of unutilized MODVAT credit and customs duty in the pending Income Tax Appeal. Additionally, the Court affirmed the admissibility of a claim for depreciation due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations but did not address the taxability of interest and miscellaneous income under Section 56 due to the Department&#039;s failure to present submissions. The civil appeal was allowed with no costs, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and comprehensive argument presentation in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>