https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34851 The court allowed the Income Tax Appeal, emphasizing that the appellant should not be penalized for the counsel's fault. The court accepted the counsel's affidavit as sufficient cause for the delay, allowing the appeal to be treated as filed within time. The Tribunal was directed to decide the appeal on its merits within a specified timeframe. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the reasons behind delays in legal proceedings and ensuring justice without unfairly penalizing parties for their counsel's negligence. en-us Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34851 The court allowed the Income Tax Appeal, emphasizing that the appellant should not be penalized for the counsel's fault. The court accepted the counsel's affidavit as sufficient cause for the delay, allowing the appeal to be treated as filed within time. The Tribunal was directed to decide the appeal on its merits within a specified timeframe. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the reasons behind delays in legal proceedings and ensuring justice without unfairly penalizing parties for their counsel's negligence. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34851