https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311142 Delay in filing and re-filing the appeal was condoned despite a vague explanation, and the Court proceeded to hear the matter on merits. On the disciplinary issue, writ interference with a charge-sheet against a quasi-judicial officer was upheld because the record disclosed no corruption, mala fides, extraneous consideration, or lack of jurisdiction. The Court applied the settled rule that a charge-sheet is not normally quashed in writ jurisdiction, but exceptional interference is available where the proceeding is wholly illegal or without jurisdiction. Bona fide quasi-judicial action was therefore protected, and disciplinary action could not rest merely on an alleged error of law. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Dec 2023 20:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311142 Delay in filing and re-filing the appeal was condoned despite a vague explanation, and the Court proceeded to hear the matter on merits. On the disciplinary issue, writ interference with a charge-sheet against a quasi-judicial officer was upheld because the record disclosed no corruption, mala fides, extraneous consideration, or lack of jurisdiction. The Court applied the settled rule that a charge-sheet is not normally quashed in writ jurisdiction, but exceptional interference is available where the proceeding is wholly illegal or without jurisdiction. Bona fide quasi-judicial action was therefore protected, and disciplinary action could not rest merely on an alleged error of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311142