<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 276 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311137</link>
    <description>In a house dacoity with murder prosecution, the Court accepted the evidence of injured and natural witnesses as reliable because it was corroborated by the prompt first information statement, medical injury evidence, and the post-mortem material; the absence of the investigating officer and post-mortem doctor was not shown to have caused real prejudice, so the conviction was upheld. For the appellant found to be about 15 years old at the time of occurrence, juvenile law protection applied: the conviction remained intact, but the sentence was modified, with release on probation of good conduct and compensation substituted for custodial punishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 276 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311137</link>
      <description>In a house dacoity with murder prosecution, the Court accepted the evidence of injured and natural witnesses as reliable because it was corroborated by the prompt first information statement, medical injury evidence, and the post-mortem material; the absence of the investigating officer and post-mortem doctor was not shown to have caused real prejudice, so the conviction was upheld. For the appellant found to be about 15 years old at the time of occurrence, juvenile law protection applied: the conviction remained intact, but the sentence was modified, with release on probation of good conduct and compensation substituted for custodial punishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>