https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311113 The HC dismissed the Sales Tax Revision (No.66/2017) due to want of prosecution after it remained inactive for over five years. An interlocutory application to recall the dismissal order dated 27.04.2022 was filed, citing administrative changes and inadvertence as reasons for the delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court found these justifications inadequate, deeming the delay explanations flimsy and rejecting the application to recall the order for lack of merit. en-us Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:56:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311113 The HC dismissed the Sales Tax Revision (No.66/2017) due to want of prosecution after it remained inactive for over five years. An interlocutory application to recall the dismissal order dated 27.04.2022 was filed, citing administrative changes and inadvertence as reasons for the delay in filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court found these justifications inadequate, deeming the delay explanations flimsy and rejecting the application to recall the order for lack of merit. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311113