https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311112 Inclusion in a select list does not create a vested or indefeasible right to appointment. Once advertised vacancies are filled, the selection process is exhausted and the list cannot be used to fill later vacancies or vacancies arising from non-joining candidates. Reserved vacancies cannot ordinarily be de-reserved under the Punjab Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act, 2006; unfilled reserved posts must be carried forward consistently with Article 16(4B). Article 14 does not support negative equality, so allegedly irregular appointments cannot require repetition of illegality. Claims for appointment, de-reservation, and parity therefore fail. en-us Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:56:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311112 Inclusion in a select list does not create a vested or indefeasible right to appointment. Once advertised vacancies are filled, the selection process is exhausted and the list cannot be used to fill later vacancies or vacancies arising from non-joining candidates. Reserved vacancies cannot ordinarily be de-reserved under the Punjab Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act, 2006; unfilled reserved posts must be carried forward consistently with Article 16(4B). Article 14 does not support negative equality, so allegedly irregular appointments cannot require repetition of illegality. Claims for appointment, de-reservation, and parity therefore fail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311112