https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311111 A decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 could not stand where the trial court ignored the specifically raised effect of amended Section 39 of the Insurance Act on insurance policy proceeds matured after the 2015 amendment. The court noted that the amended nominee regime for parent, spouse and children had to be examined before treating nomination as ineffective. It also held that the trial court wrongly clubbed disputed provident fund and medical reimbursement claims with insurance proceeds and computed relief on a basis beyond the application. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 18 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:56:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311111 A decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 could not stand where the trial court ignored the specifically raised effect of amended Section 39 of the Insurance Act on insurance policy proceeds matured after the 2015 amendment. The court noted that the amended nominee regime for parent, spouse and children had to be examined before treating nomination as ineffective. It also held that the trial court wrongly clubbed disputed provident fund and medical reimbursement claims with insurance proceeds and computed relief on a basis beyond the application. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311111