<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 392 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446708</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, a company in the construction business, by deleting the addition of Rs. 3,78,946/- made by the AO under section 68 for unexplained advances from customers. The assessee provided additional evidence, including booking letters and bank statements, to demonstrate the genuineness of the advance received from a non-resident individual. The ITAT found the evidence satisfactory and concluded that the advance was genuine and properly accounted for, thus allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 392 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446708</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, a company in the construction business, by deleting the addition of Rs. 3,78,946/- made by the AO under section 68 for unexplained advances from customers. The assessee provided additional evidence, including booking letters and bank statements, to demonstrate the genuineness of the advance received from a non-resident individual. The ITAT found the evidence satisfactory and concluded that the advance was genuine and properly accounted for, thus allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>