https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311107 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and its applicability to continuing unlawful activities, even if initiated before the Act's enforcement. The court held that Section 3 did not violate Article 20(1) of the Constitution as it did not retrospectively create offences but addressed ongoing criminal enterprises. The petitioner's challenge was deemed without merit, and the court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311107 The court dismissed the petition, affirming the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and its applicability to continuing unlawful activities, even if initiated before the Act's enforcement. The court held that Section 3 did not violate Article 20(1) of the Constitution as it did not retrospectively create offences but addressed ongoing criminal enterprises. The petitioner's challenge was deemed without merit, and the court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311107