https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311106 The HC concluded that the respondent-chartered accountant was not guilty of professional misconduct, as there was no conclusive evidence proving his knowledge of the articled clerk's employment at Liberty Insurance Co. Ltd. during office hours. The evidence presented did not sufficiently establish that the respondent was aware or had connived in the clerk's additional employment. Consequently, the HC dismissed the complaint and declined to refer the case back to the Council for further inquiry, citing the lack of clear evidence and the inconvenience already caused to the respondent. en-us Wed, 24 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Dec 2023 16:14:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311106 The HC concluded that the respondent-chartered accountant was not guilty of professional misconduct, as there was no conclusive evidence proving his knowledge of the articled clerk's employment at Liberty Insurance Co. Ltd. during office hours. The evidence presented did not sufficiently establish that the respondent was aware or had connived in the clerk's additional employment. Consequently, the HC dismissed the complaint and declined to refer the case back to the Council for further inquiry, citing the lack of clear evidence and the inconvenience already caused to the respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311106