<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (1) TMI 39 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311104</link>
    <description>Sub-sections (7A) and (7B) permit administrative transfer of income-tax cases and authorise supervisory officers to give guidance and exercise income-tax officer powers; these provisions are facially neutral, of universal application, and do not on their face alter statutory procedure, available remedies, or increase punitory consequences. Precedent invalidating special provisions requires demonstrable deprivation of remedies or materially more onerous consequences; mere possibility of unequal treatment or alleged administrative bias is insufficient. The challenger bears the burden to prove substantial deviation in procedure or punitive effect, and officials&#039; good faith is presumed; the constitutional challenge therefore fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (1) TMI 39 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311104</link>
      <description>Sub-sections (7A) and (7B) permit administrative transfer of income-tax cases and authorise supervisory officers to give guidance and exercise income-tax officer powers; these provisions are facially neutral, of universal application, and do not on their face alter statutory procedure, available remedies, or increase punitory consequences. Precedent invalidating special provisions requires demonstrable deprivation of remedies or materially more onerous consequences; mere possibility of unequal treatment or alleged administrative bias is insufficient. The challenger bears the burden to prove substantial deviation in procedure or punitive effect, and officials&#039; good faith is presumed; the constitutional challenge therefore fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>