<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 358 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446674</link>
    <description>HC ruled that detention order under GST Act was partially valid. While goods were properly documented, the penalty calculation was incorrect. Court quashed the original penalty order and directed the Assistant Commissioner to recalculate penalty under section 129(1)(a) within seven days, allowing petitioner to pursue additional legal remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 358 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446674</link>
      <description>HC ruled that detention order under GST Act was partially valid. While goods were properly documented, the penalty calculation was incorrect. Court quashed the original penalty order and directed the Assistant Commissioner to recalculate penalty under section 129(1)(a) within seven days, allowing petitioner to pursue additional legal remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>