<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 301 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner has the right to file an appeal directly without authorizing another officer, emphasizing that procedural irregularities should not impede the substantive right to appeal. The matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution due to conflicting interpretations in previous decisions. The judgment was pronounced on 4-4-2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 301 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner has the right to file an appeal directly without authorizing another officer, emphasizing that procedural irregularities should not impede the substantive right to appeal. The matter was referred to a Larger Bench for resolution due to conflicting interpretations in previous decisions. The judgment was pronounced on 4-4-2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>