<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 147 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34817</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further examination. The Member (J) set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and directed the original authority to determine if the service tax paid on catering service formed part of the cost of production of the final product based on a specific formula. If so, the tax would be admissible as input service tax credit. Other related appeals with similar issues were also noted for appropriate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 147 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34817</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand for further examination. The Member (J) set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and directed the original authority to determine if the service tax paid on catering service formed part of the cost of production of the final product based on a specific formula. If so, the tax would be admissible as input service tax credit. Other related appeals with similar issues were also noted for appropriate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>