https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311097 The HC of Madras dismissed a Writ Petition by a Bank challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Court determined that the Bank should seek remedy through the Appellate Tribunal, as outlined in the Act, rather than through the HC. The Court emphasized adherence to the statutory framework and procedures for challenging provisional attachment orders, resulting in the dismissal of the Writ Petition without costs. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Dec 2023 18:49:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311097 The HC of Madras dismissed a Writ Petition by a Bank challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Court determined that the Bank should seek remedy through the Appellate Tribunal, as outlined in the Act, rather than through the HC. The Court emphasized adherence to the statutory framework and procedures for challenging provisional attachment orders, resulting in the dismissal of the Writ Petition without costs. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311097