<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 40 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34811</link>
    <description>Composite technology-transfer arrangements are taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services where the substance is the transfer of know-how and the making available of technical knowledge to the Indian enterprise, even if technical documentation is supplied offshore. The transfer of know-how and the right to use technical documentation was treated as royalty under the Act and the India-USA treaty. By contrast, an outright transfer of ownership in tread and side-wall designs or patterns was not royalty to that extent, although related product-development payments linked to know-how were taxable. Consultancy, assistance and training fees were also taxable as included services and technical services because they made technical knowledge available for independent use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 40 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34811</link>
      <description>Composite technology-transfer arrangements are taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services where the substance is the transfer of know-how and the making available of technical knowledge to the Indian enterprise, even if technical documentation is supplied offshore. The transfer of know-how and the right to use technical documentation was treated as royalty under the Act and the India-USA treaty. By contrast, an outright transfer of ownership in tread and side-wall designs or patterns was not royalty to that extent, although related product-development payments linked to know-how were taxable. Consultancy, assistance and training fees were also taxable as included services and technical services because they made technical knowledge available for independent use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>