<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446605</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding GST payment dispute. The court directed respondents to de-freeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account after finding compliance with Section 107 of GST Act, specifically noting the petitioner&#039;s payment of Rs. 83,000 and undertaking to deposit pending Input Tax Credit. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, mandating account de-freezing within one week.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446605</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding GST payment dispute. The court directed respondents to de-freeze the petitioner&#039;s bank account after finding compliance with Section 107 of GST Act, specifically noting the petitioner&#039;s payment of Rs. 83,000 and undertaking to deposit pending Input Tax Credit. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, mandating account de-freezing within one week.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>