<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 273 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446589</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments for corporate guarantee and other disallowances. The court held that no TP adjustment was warranted for performance guarantee given by assessee to secure Dubai bridge construction contract through subsidiary, as assessee bore entire risk, deployed assets, and reaped 99% profits while associated enterprise performed negligible functions. Interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was upheld following earlier tribunal decisions limiting disallowance to incremental loans from specific date. Depreciation claim on speedboat was allowed based on precedent where assessee had possession and business use despite principal&#039;s ownership. Professional fees for arbitration award were allowed as legitimate business expenditure, rejecting Revenue&#039;s argument linking it to excluded arbitration income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 273 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446589</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments for corporate guarantee and other disallowances. The court held that no TP adjustment was warranted for performance guarantee given by assessee to secure Dubai bridge construction contract through subsidiary, as assessee bore entire risk, deployed assets, and reaped 99% profits while associated enterprise performed negligible functions. Interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) was upheld following earlier tribunal decisions limiting disallowance to incremental loans from specific date. Depreciation claim on speedboat was allowed based on precedent where assessee had possession and business use despite principal&#039;s ownership. Professional fees for arbitration award were allowed as legitimate business expenditure, rejecting Revenue&#039;s argument linking it to excluded arbitration income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>