<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 32 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted penalty waiver to the appellant for delayed payment of service tax, citing issues with software implementation causing unintentional delays. The Tribunal considered excess payments, Circular exemptions, and Mumbai High Court clarifications on imported services, leading to the decision to set aside the penalty imposed by the Central Excise department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 32 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted penalty waiver to the appellant for delayed payment of service tax, citing issues with software implementation causing unintentional delays. The Tribunal considered excess payments, Circular exemptions, and Mumbai High Court clarifications on imported services, leading to the decision to set aside the penalty imposed by the Central Excise department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>