https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34797 The Court rejected the application seeking reference against an order by the Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the distinction between clearing goods for excise purposes and dispatching them to customers. The judgment clarified the contractual obligations regarding inspection and despatch, highlighting that goods had been inspected before the clearance date, supporting the CEGAT's findings. The Court found no merit in the application and did not award any costs. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34797 The Court rejected the application seeking reference against an order by the Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the distinction between clearing goods for excise purposes and dispatching them to customers. The judgment clarified the contractual obligations regarding inspection and despatch, highlighting that goods had been inspected before the clearance date, supporting the CEGAT's findings. The Court found no merit in the application and did not award any costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34797