<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 24 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34793</link>
    <description>The appellate court remanded the case to the Commissioner for further consideration. The Commissioner was directed to assess the admissibility of reimbursable expenses in calculating service tax liability and to review the appellant&#039;s request for leniency on penalties. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case again. The judgment emphasized the importance of addressing all issues raised by the appellants during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 24 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34793</link>
      <description>The appellate court remanded the case to the Commissioner for further consideration. The Commissioner was directed to assess the admissibility of reimbursable expenses in calculating service tax liability and to review the appellant&#039;s request for leniency on penalties. The appellants were granted an opportunity to present their case again. The judgment emphasized the importance of addressing all issues raised by the appellants during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>