<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 107 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34792</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal. It restored the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order, sanctioning the refund of excess duty paid by the appellant-importer/assessee. The High Court held that the refund claim was maintainable and rightly sanctioned, as the Assistant Commissioner was competent to reassess the duty and process the refund based on the physical examination report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 107 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34792</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal. It restored the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order, sanctioning the refund of excess duty paid by the appellant-importer/assessee. The High Court held that the refund claim was maintainable and rightly sanctioned, as the Assistant Commissioner was competent to reassess the duty and process the refund based on the physical examination report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>