<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 232 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446548</link>
    <description>The Madras HC set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 for violating principles of natural justice. The court found that the tax authority failed to provide the petitioner with a personal hearing opportunity despite the statutory mandate and the petitioner&#039;s specific request in their reply to the show cause notice. The HC emphasized that Section 75(4) requires authorities to provide personal hearing opportunities when contemplating adverse decisions against assessees, regardless of whether requested. The court noted this violation could not be rectified and would cause revenue loss to the department, leading to the petition being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 232 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446548</link>
      <description>The Madras HC set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 for violating principles of natural justice. The court found that the tax authority failed to provide the petitioner with a personal hearing opportunity despite the statutory mandate and the petitioner&#039;s specific request in their reply to the show cause notice. The HC emphasized that Section 75(4) requires authorities to provide personal hearing opportunities when contemplating adverse decisions against assessees, regardless of whether requested. The court noted this violation could not be rectified and would cause revenue loss to the department, leading to the petition being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>