<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 224 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446540</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision restricting disallowance of unexplained purchases to 6% instead of 12.5%. The court relied on precedent from Pankaj K. Choudhary case, finding that ITAT had properly analyzed the facts before reducing the disallowance rate. HC concluded no substantial questions of law arose and declined to interfere with the tribunal&#039;s findings, affirming the reduced disallowance percentage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 224 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446540</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision restricting disallowance of unexplained purchases to 6% instead of 12.5%. The court relied on precedent from Pankaj K. Choudhary case, finding that ITAT had properly analyzed the facts before reducing the disallowance rate. HC concluded no substantial questions of law arose and declined to interfere with the tribunal&#039;s findings, affirming the reduced disallowance percentage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>