<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 249 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34788</link>
    <description>A later quantity restriction inserted into an amended value-based advance licence does not retrospectively defeat customs exemption for imports already made within the licence&#039;s overall CIF value limit under Notification No. 203/92-Cus. The imports were effected before the restriction existed and complied with the licence conditions then in force; a subsequent enhancement of the licence value with added quantity limits was only prospective. Because the licensing authority had accepted the imports, Customs could not later treat them as a breach of the original licence conditions or deny exemption on the basis of the later amendment. The resulting duty demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 249 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34788</link>
      <description>A later quantity restriction inserted into an amended value-based advance licence does not retrospectively defeat customs exemption for imports already made within the licence&#039;s overall CIF value limit under Notification No. 203/92-Cus. The imports were effected before the restriction existed and complied with the licence conditions then in force; a subsequent enhancement of the licence value with added quantity limits was only prospective. Because the licensing authority had accepted the imports, Customs could not later treat them as a breach of the original licence conditions or deny exemption on the basis of the later amendment. The resulting duty demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>