<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 200 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446516</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR was not maintainable at the instance of petitioners who were not arrayed as accused, because they lacked the necessary locus standi to challenge the FIR on merits. A separate prayer for release of the seized truck and goods was also not entertained in writ jurisdiction, as the petitioners were required to pursue the statutory remedy before the competent criminal court for custody of seized property. Liberty was preserved to seek such relief in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 200 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446516</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR was not maintainable at the instance of petitioners who were not arrayed as accused, because they lacked the necessary locus standi to challenge the FIR on merits. A separate prayer for release of the seized truck and goods was also not entertained in writ jurisdiction, as the petitioners were required to pursue the statutory remedy before the competent criminal court for custody of seized property. Liberty was preserved to seek such relief in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>