<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 199 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446515</link>
    <description>A prior secured interest created by deposit of title deeds and a later SARFAESI sale can prevail over a customs attachment when the customs law does not create a statutory first charge. The secured creditor&#039;s priority was recognised under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, and the purchaser&#039;s title was treated as protected where no effective attachment entry appeared in the encumbrance register. The contention that the mortgage was invalid for want of registration was rejected because a deposit of title deeds mortgage remained valid under the applicable registration regime. On these principles, the customs claim could not displace the earlier secured debt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 199 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446515</link>
      <description>A prior secured interest created by deposit of title deeds and a later SARFAESI sale can prevail over a customs attachment when the customs law does not create a statutory first charge. The secured creditor&#039;s priority was recognised under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, and the purchaser&#039;s title was treated as protected where no effective attachment entry appeared in the encumbrance register. The contention that the mortgage was invalid for want of registration was rejected because a deposit of title deeds mortgage remained valid under the applicable registration regime. On these principles, the customs claim could not displace the earlier secured debt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>