<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 180 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446496</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Chandigarh disposed of an appeal concerning service tax levy on business auxiliary services for commission received from Amway during July 2003 to March 2005. Following the precedent established in Paramjit Kaur Others case where 83 similar appeals were remanded, the Tribunal remanded this matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication on identical grounds. The appeal was resolved through remand rather than substantive determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 180 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446496</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Chandigarh disposed of an appeal concerning service tax levy on business auxiliary services for commission received from Amway during July 2003 to March 2005. Following the precedent established in Paramjit Kaur Others case where 83 similar appeals were remanded, the Tribunal remanded this matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication on identical grounds. The appeal was resolved through remand rather than substantive determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>