<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 202 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34785</link>
    <description>Plastic tanks used for storing chemicals were treated as tanks or vats for holding liquids and, applying Note 11(a) of Chapter 39, were classified under Heading 39.25 and sub-heading 3925.10 rather than Heading 3926.90. On that classification, the goods were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 15/94-C.E. The earlier contrary view treating them as exempt articles under the alternative heading was regarded as incorrect, and the settled classification position was followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 202 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34785</link>
      <description>Plastic tanks used for storing chemicals were treated as tanks or vats for holding liquids and, applying Note 11(a) of Chapter 39, were classified under Heading 39.25 and sub-heading 3925.10 rather than Heading 3926.90. On that classification, the goods were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 15/94-C.E. The earlier contrary view treating them as exempt articles under the alternative heading was regarded as incorrect, and the settled classification position was followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>