<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1333 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311070</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the writ petition filed by an electrical contractor seeking mandamus to compel GST remittance. The court held it lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate disputed contractual payment facts and recommended the petitioner pursue alternative legal remedies for resolving the GST payment dispute with the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1333 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311070</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the writ petition filed by an electrical contractor seeking mandamus to compel GST remittance. The court held it lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate disputed contractual payment facts and recommended the petitioner pursue alternative legal remedies for resolving the GST payment dispute with the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>