https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311061 The HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the Assistant Commissioner of Customs to address the petitioner's representation dated 21.8.2015 within 45 days of receiving the court's order. The court emphasized the necessity for a reasoned order to be promptly communicated to the petitioner. This decision aimed to resolve the petitioner's grievance concerning the non-response to their refund request for the seized rubber, ensuring a timely and effective resolution. en-us Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2023 21:03:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311061 The HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the Assistant Commissioner of Customs to address the petitioner's representation dated 21.8.2015 within 45 days of receiving the court's order. The court emphasized the necessity for a reasoned order to be promptly communicated to the petitioner. This decision aimed to resolve the petitioner's grievance concerning the non-response to their refund request for the seized rubber, ensuring a timely and effective resolution. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311061