<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 145 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34780</link>
    <description>The appeal centered on the rejection of Cenvat credit on service tax paid by the MSO and penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The appellant claimed entitlement to the credit but faced challenges due to insufficient evidence of tax payment. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the documents submitted and ordered a remand for verification by the Original Adjudicating Authority. The matter also involved assessing the eligibility for Cenvat credit and considering a reasonable cause for waiving penalties under Section 80, prompting a re-evaluation by the Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 145 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34780</link>
      <description>The appeal centered on the rejection of Cenvat credit on service tax paid by the MSO and penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78. The appellant claimed entitlement to the credit but faced challenges due to insufficient evidence of tax payment. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the documents submitted and ordered a remand for verification by the Original Adjudicating Authority. The matter also involved assessing the eligibility for Cenvat credit and considering a reasonable cause for waiving penalties under Section 80, prompting a re-evaluation by the Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>