https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311049 The commentary examines preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, upholding Section 3(1)(a)(iii) and the corresponding delegated power as a valid legislative arrangement rather than an invalid delegation. It also notes that a mistaken statutory reference in the communication of grounds did not vitiate detention where the order itself was clear and no prejudice was shown. On trade rights, it states that treaty-based trading arrangements under the Anglo-Tibet Trade Regulations, 1914 and the Indian Independence (International Arrangements) Order, 1947 did not create enforceable private rights in municipal courts against later Indian export controls. It further records that intelligible detention grounds and absence of mala fides supported the orders. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2023 15:02:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311049 The commentary examines preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, upholding Section 3(1)(a)(iii) and the corresponding delegated power as a valid legislative arrangement rather than an invalid delegation. It also notes that a mistaken statutory reference in the communication of grounds did not vitiate detention where the order itself was clear and no prejudice was shown. On trade rights, it states that treaty-based trading arrangements under the Anglo-Tibet Trade Regulations, 1914 and the Indian Independence (International Arrangements) Order, 1947 did not create enforceable private rights in municipal courts against later Indian export controls. It further records that intelligible detention grounds and absence of mala fides supported the orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311049