<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446470</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of the taxpayer&#039;s legal representative, directing GST registration cancellation effective 31.03.2020. The court found the retrospective cancellation from 01.07.2017 unsustainable, particularly after the taxpayer&#039;s death. The order was invalidated due to lack of substantive reasons and improper procedural handling, emphasizing that a taxpayer cannot be held responsible for filing returns after business closure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446470</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of the taxpayer&#039;s legal representative, directing GST registration cancellation effective 31.03.2020. The court found the retrospective cancellation from 01.07.2017 unsustainable, particularly after the taxpayer&#039;s death. The order was invalidated due to lack of substantive reasons and improper procedural handling, emphasizing that a taxpayer cannot be held responsible for filing returns after business closure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>