<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 152 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446468</link>
    <description>The HC addressed a dispute over GST registration rejection where the petitioner challenged the respondent&#039;s decision. After reviewing the premises and hearing arguments, the HC directed the respondents to issue a GST registration number within a week, contingent on proper property demarcation. The court mandated the petitioner to submit a demarcation report and set a compliance reporting date, effectively resolving the registration impasse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 152 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446468</link>
      <description>The HC addressed a dispute over GST registration rejection where the petitioner challenged the respondent&#039;s decision. After reviewing the premises and hearing arguments, the HC directed the respondents to issue a GST registration number within a week, contingent on proper property demarcation. The court mandated the petitioner to submit a demarcation report and set a compliance reporting date, effectively resolving the registration impasse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>