https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34772 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in a case involving the payment of Service Tax by a dealer-respondent, who had provided job worker services previously exempted under a notification. The Tribunal found no willful mis-statement or suppression of facts by the dealer-respondent and granted the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, leading to the conclusion that no penalty should be imposed. The High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that no substantial legal question warranting determination was raised, resulting in the appeal being rejected. en-us Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34772 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in a case involving the payment of Service Tax by a dealer-respondent, who had provided job worker services previously exempted under a notification. The Tribunal found no willful mis-statement or suppression of facts by the dealer-respondent and granted the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, leading to the conclusion that no penalty should be imposed. The High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that no substantial legal question warranting determination was raised, resulting in the appeal being rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34772