https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446460 Inordinate delay in filing special leave petitions was treated as a sufficient procedural ground for dismissal, with delays of 422 days and 524 days recorded as unexplained and substantial. The petitions were also not entertained on merits, because the Court applied its earlier order dated 03.07.2023 in similar petitions and followed that precedent to dispose of the present matters. The text states that the special leave petitions were dismissed both for delay and on merits, and that pending applications stood disposed of. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 May 2026 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446460 Inordinate delay in filing special leave petitions was treated as a sufficient procedural ground for dismissal, with delays of 422 days and 524 days recorded as unexplained and substantial. The petitions were also not entertained on merits, because the Court applied its earlier order dated 03.07.2023 in similar petitions and followed that precedent to dispose of the present matters. The text states that the special leave petitions were dismissed both for delay and on merits, and that pending applications stood disposed of. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446460