<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34771</link>
    <description>The judgment affirms the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the actual cost of germplasm seeds, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument against the appellant&#039;s claim based on past non-claims. It clarifies the distinction between actual and notional allowances for depreciation, emphasizing the statutory privilege of claiming depreciation based on actual costs incurred by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34771</link>
      <description>The judgment affirms the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on the actual cost of germplasm seeds, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument against the appellant&#039;s claim based on past non-claims. It clarifies the distinction between actual and notional allowances for depreciation, emphasizing the statutory privilege of claiming depreciation based on actual costs incurred by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>