<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 123 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446439</link>
    <description>Processing waste PET bottles into PET flakes was treated as manufacture, not a taxable Business Auxiliary Service, because the activity resulted in a distinct exempt product and the contrary revenue case did not dislodge the adjudicating authority&#039;s factual and classification findings. The exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was also maintained, as the revenue failed to prove that the principal manufacturer&#039;s final goods were cleared at nil duty or without payment of appropriate duty after 08.05.2012. On that evidentiary record, the exemption could not be denied and the assessee remained entitled to relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 07:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 123 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446439</link>
      <description>Processing waste PET bottles into PET flakes was treated as manufacture, not a taxable Business Auxiliary Service, because the activity resulted in a distinct exempt product and the contrary revenue case did not dislodge the adjudicating authority&#039;s factual and classification findings. The exemption under Notification No. 8/2005-ST was also maintained, as the revenue failed to prove that the principal manufacturer&#039;s final goods were cleared at nil duty or without payment of appropriate duty after 08.05.2012. On that evidentiary record, the exemption could not be denied and the assessee remained entitled to relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>