https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446437 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order demanding service tax on reimbursement of expenses for the period 2009-10 to 2013-14. It found that service tax was not applicable prior to April 14, 2015, based on a SC judgment. The Tribunal also determined that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as the audit report indicated departmental awareness of the non-payment. Consequently, the appellant was granted consequential relief. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Dec 2023 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446437 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order demanding service tax on reimbursement of expenses for the period 2009-10 to 2013-14. It found that service tax was not applicable prior to April 14, 2015, based on a SC judgment. The Tribunal also determined that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant, as the audit report indicated departmental awareness of the non-payment. Consequently, the appellant was granted consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446437