<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 114 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446430</link>
    <description>Duty demand based on seven invoices for lamination work was stated to be unsustainable where the invoices reflected mixed components such as processing, plates, printing, lamination and carriage, and the record did not explain any material distinction from invoices on which demand had been dropped. Confiscation of seized carton boxes and varnished paper sheets, together with redemption fine, was also stated to fail because excisability had not been established with certainty; carton boxes were acknowledged as non-dutiable, while varnished paper sheets were treated only on assumption. Consequential penalties on the appellant and co-noticees were likewise said to fall once the demand and confiscation were unsupported by complete facts and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 07:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 114 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446430</link>
      <description>Duty demand based on seven invoices for lamination work was stated to be unsustainable where the invoices reflected mixed components such as processing, plates, printing, lamination and carriage, and the record did not explain any material distinction from invoices on which demand had been dropped. Confiscation of seized carton boxes and varnished paper sheets, together with redemption fine, was also stated to fail because excisability had not been established with certainty; carton boxes were acknowledged as non-dutiable, while varnished paper sheets were treated only on assumption. Consequential penalties on the appellant and co-noticees were likewise said to fall once the demand and confiscation were unsupported by complete facts and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>