<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 104 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals against tax demands on surrendered amounts by respondents in a case involving taxable &quot;Pandal and Shamiana Service.&quot; Emphasizing the lack of evidence linking the surrendered income to the taxable service, the Tribunal highlighted the burden of proof on the department, noting the absence of proper inquiry and reliance on presumption. The decision underscored the necessity of establishing a connection between surrendered amounts and taxable services before imposing tax liabilities, ultimately leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 104 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals against tax demands on surrendered amounts by respondents in a case involving taxable &quot;Pandal and Shamiana Service.&quot; Emphasizing the lack of evidence linking the surrendered income to the taxable service, the Tribunal highlighted the burden of proof on the department, noting the absence of proper inquiry and reliance on presumption. The decision underscored the necessity of establishing a connection between surrendered amounts and taxable services before imposing tax liabilities, ultimately leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>