<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2044 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311039</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition, determining that the lookout notice against the petitioner had lapsed. Since the petitioner was already detained and produced before the Investigating Officer, the court deemed the notice non-operative. The court concluded that the petitioner could travel freely in and out of the country without restrictions from the expired notice, as no further orders were necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 21:17:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2044 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311039</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition, determining that the lookout notice against the petitioner had lapsed. Since the petitioner was already detained and produced before the Investigating Officer, the court deemed the notice non-operative. The court concluded that the petitioner could travel freely in and out of the country without restrictions from the expired notice, as no further orders were necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>