<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 65 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34765</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) upheld the tax demand on Repair and Maintenance Services, finding suppression of facts proven. However, the demand for the extended period was deemed unsustainable due to the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and dropped tax demands in two categories. The tax demand based on limitation was set aside, and the order on tax demands and penalties was overturned in favor of the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 65 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34765</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) upheld the tax demand on Repair and Maintenance Services, finding suppression of facts proven. However, the demand for the extended period was deemed unsustainable due to the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and dropped tax demands in two categories. The tax demand based on limitation was set aside, and the order on tax demands and penalties was overturned in favor of the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>