<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1161 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311028</link>
    <description>A foreign national cannot claim the same freedom of movement and residence as a citizen when challenging a Look Out Circular. The text explains that, for foreigners, constitutional protection is confined to life and personal liberty under Article 21, while the statutory and administrative framework permits restrictions on movement, residence, arrival and departure for monitoring and law-enforcement purposes. It also notes that prior visa violations and the stated basis for the circular supported its continuation, so holding a student visa did not by itself make the circular unlawful. The challenge to withdrawal of the Look Out Circular therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 17:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1161 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311028</link>
      <description>A foreign national cannot claim the same freedom of movement and residence as a citizen when challenging a Look Out Circular. The text explains that, for foreigners, constitutional protection is confined to life and personal liberty under Article 21, while the statutory and administrative framework permits restrictions on movement, residence, arrival and departure for monitoring and law-enforcement purposes. It also notes that prior visa violations and the stated basis for the circular supported its continuation, so holding a student visa did not by itself make the circular unlawful. The challenge to withdrawal of the Look Out Circular therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>