<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 194 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a photography service provider against the inclusion of the cost of photographic paper and chemicals in the taxable value of their service. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing precedents where penalties were overturned in similar cases. The decision emphasizes the importance of legal precedents in tax disputes and the need for consistency in penalty imposition based on established case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 194 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a photography service provider against the inclusion of the cost of photographic paper and chemicals in the taxable value of their service. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing precedents where penalties were overturned in similar cases. The decision emphasizes the importance of legal precedents in tax disputes and the need for consistency in penalty imposition based on established case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>