<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 94 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446410</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that compensation paid by the assessee for closure of an agreement constituted allowable business expenditure. The AO disallowed the claim alleging the agreement was an afterthought and sham transaction between related parties. The tribunal found the payment was connected to the assessee&#039;s business, properly documented through annual accounts, agreements, payment certificates, and disclosed in recipient company&#039;s accounts. Since the land for which compensation was paid generated taxable business income, and payment was proven genuine, the deduction was allowed. The AO&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=733739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 94 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446410</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that compensation paid by the assessee for closure of an agreement constituted allowable business expenditure. The AO disallowed the claim alleging the agreement was an afterthought and sham transaction between related parties. The tribunal found the payment was connected to the assessee&#039;s business, properly documented through annual accounts, agreements, payment certificates, and disclosed in recipient company&#039;s accounts. Since the land for which compensation was paid generated taxable business income, and payment was proven genuine, the deduction was allowed. The AO&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>