<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34758</link>
    <description>The court directed the Tribunal to hear the petitioner&#039;s application, emphasizing the duty to address all relevant points for comprehensive adjudication and procedural justice. The third member was instructed not to proceed with resolving points of difference until the rectification application was decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34758</link>
      <description>The court directed the Tribunal to hear the petitioner&#039;s application, emphasizing the duty to address all relevant points for comprehensive adjudication and procedural justice. The third member was instructed not to proceed with resolving points of difference until the rectification application was decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>