<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 54 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34754</link>
    <description>The Court remitted a batch of Writ Petitions back to the first respondent for fresh consideration in light of a new CBDT order, setting aside the previous order. The judgment directed reevaluation of waiver requests under Section 234(A)(B)(C) of the Act, allowing petitioners to present their case based on the latest guidelines. The Court emphasized the need for a fair review, without delving into the case&#039;s merits, and allowed the Writ Petitions for reconsideration without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 54 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34754</link>
      <description>The Court remitted a batch of Writ Petitions back to the first respondent for fresh consideration in light of a new CBDT order, setting aside the previous order. The judgment directed reevaluation of waiver requests under Section 234(A)(B)(C) of the Act, allowing petitioners to present their case based on the latest guidelines. The Court emphasized the need for a fair review, without delving into the case&#039;s merits, and allowed the Writ Petitions for reconsideration without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>